
From Hidden Infrastructure to Civic Landmark: Wastewater Plants Move Downtown
Wastewater plants are moving back into cities. From Arklow's 139-million-euro plant to a turf-roofed facility in Hillerød, five projects show how.
- Section
- Architecture
- Author
- By Grace Kim
- Filed
- Length
- 4 min read
Key takeaways
- The European Commission took Ireland to the CJEU over untreated wastewater in 38 agglomerations; Arklow's plant cost 139 million euros.
- Abbey Mills' ventilation chimneys, redundant since 1933, were demolished in 1941 over bomb-strike fears.
- Henning Larsen's Solrødgård plant treats 15,000 cubic meters of wastewater a day beneath a public climate park in Hillerød.
- NODE reworked thirteen vent shafts at Shenzhen's buried Honghu Park plant; the tallest became a 16-meter lotus tower.
In 1868, the Metropolitan Board of Works celebrated the completion of London's main drainage with a banquet inside a sewage pumping station. That building, Abbey Mills, had risen over three years under engineer Joseph Bazalgette, working with architect Charles Driver, on a cruciform plan with eight beam engines. Its style has been read as Byzantine, Italian Medieval, Russian, Ruskinian Gothic and Moorish. Its ornamented twin ventilation chimneys stood more than sixty meters tall, and the builder called it an elegant structure in a swamp that might pass for a mosque or a temple.
Almost everything else Bazalgette built was buried, and the exception did not last. Steam gave way to electric motors at Abbey Mills in 1933, and the chimneys — redundant since then — were demolished in 1941 out of fear a bomb strike would topple them onto the station. Sanitary engineering consolidated around measurable criteria: throughput, discharge quality, hydraulic gradient. Appearance registered in none of them. Treatment moved outward to floodplains, estuaries and municipal edges where land was cheap and gravity did useful work.
That outward migration has run into its limits. Land values have closed off the peripheries where these facilities used to sit, while discharge limits tighten and volumes grow across Europe and East Asia. Consent, rather than engineering, is where these projects now fail.
What does this change for architects?
The architect inherits a brief already settled in its essentials. Capacity, process, siting and budget are technically fixed. What remains is the envelope, the roof, the ground plane and the machinery — and five recent projects show what can be built from those four elements.
Arklow Waste Water Treatment Plant / Clancy Moore Architects. The European Commission took Ireland to the Court of Justice of the European Union over its failure to collect and treat urban wastewater across thirty-eight agglomerations, one of them Arklow — a town the Environmental Protection Agency identified as discharging into the Avoca River without any treatment at all. The plant that answered for it cost 139 million euros. After repeated proposals failed at planning, it went on a visible site at the town's center of gravity. The treatment processes are stacked above ground instead of sunk, and a single pump plus gravity moves the water. Louvered fiber-cement skins handle air and odor while hiding equipment that can change over time. Gantry cranes run under a solar roof, and the compact footprint frees ground for rewilding.
Solrødgård Water Treatment Plant / Henning Larsen. Serving Hillerød, the plant treats 15,000 cubic meters of wastewater a day inside a public climate park. The facility disappears beneath a turf roof crossed by walking paths and cut with skylights. A landscaped channel runs through its center between full-height glass facades, opening views into the processing and filtration areas. A creek and planted strip along the channel show how vegetation filters water.
Levanto Water Purification Plant / MMAA. MMAA's plant for Levanto and Bonassola stands on a hillside above a seafront promenade built on a former railway line, at the gateway to the Cinque Terre. It reinterprets the Ligurian agricultural terrace: two of its four levels sit underground, and the building is part of the works stabilizing a slope at risk of landslides. Above ground, two curving terraced floors step out from the hill, planted with Mediterranean shrubs and a hanging garden. Bands of local Rosso and Verde Levanto stone clad the facade.
Water Treatment Plant / AWP. AWP's renovation of a 1970s plant on the Seine in Évry, near the Francilienne motorway, increases capacity and moves a once-hidden facility into public view. A main axis along the river organizes gardens, new buildings and tanks. The plant opens regularly to visitors and works as a landmark and a park where people can experience water filtration. The existing buildings' facades were redesigned as filters at an urban scale.
Shenzhen Lotus Water Culture Base / NODE Architecture & Urbanism. When NODE was asked to design the ground above Shenzhen's Honghu Park plant, the fully buried facility had already been engineered. The design focuses on the thirteen vent shafts rising through the surface, reworked using elements of Lingnan gardens. The tallest, a 16-meter deodorizing shaft, became an abstracted lotus tower with a bird-watching platform. Smaller shafts carry paths, platforms and planted grilles, while pavilions and corridors surround a sunken garden leading to an underground exhibition hall.
Together, these projects mark a shift engineers stopped making after 1933: treatment plants are returning to the centers they once fled, and architects are the ones negotiating their welcome.
Original: ice.org.uk
More from Grace Kim
Show full bio
Staff writer covering money, funding and market shifts around construction industry, architecture, interior design at Built Current.
150 articles


