
Alonakia House: React Architects follow Antiparos’s topography
React Architects’ 350 m² Alonakia House occupies a steep west-facing slope in Antiparos, conceived as a continuation of the existing topography in the Cycladic landscape.
- Author
- By Amara Osei
- Filed
- Length
- 3 min read
Key takeaways
- Alonakia House has a listed area of 350 m² and a project year of 2025.
- React Architects designed the house; Natasha Deliyianni and Yiorgos Spiridonos are the lead architects.
- The project occupies a steep west-facing slope in Antiparos overlooking the open Aegean.
- Panagiotis Voumvakis is credited with the photographs.
- The credits list 10 manufacturers, including FILPRO, LACOMAR, PAFOS SA, Subzero and THERMOPANART.
By Amara Osei
Alonakia House has an area of 350 m² and a project year of 2025, according to React Architects’ project credits. React Architects’ description places the house on a steep west-facing slope in Antiparos, overlooking the open Aegean and the long horizon of the setting sun.
React Architects list Natasha Deliyianni and Yiorgos Spiridonos as lead architects. They also credit Panagiotis Voumvakis with the photographs. Those details establish the record before the design rhetoric begins.
What does the site dictate?
In their supplied description, React Architects call the site “a rugged terrain in which building is inseparable from the act of shaping the ground.” The phrase sets the project’s governing task: construction and the shaping of ground are one operation. Alonakia House is therefore framed less as an object placed against a view than as part of the slope’s continued form.
React Architects reject introducing a single, separate object onto the hillside. Their alternative is “a continuation of the existing topography.” The project reads more like a contour line extended across the slope than a detached villa with a view attached. The architects describe the house as part of the land’s form, not a separate composition placed before it.
The supplied account does not explain how that continuity is built. It gives no sections, grading plan or room sequence, and it does not specify how the house meets the rugged ground. The ambition is clear. The supplied text offers no construction detail. A topographic intention is easy to claim and harder to document.
How does the house meet the landscape?
At 350 m², Alonakia House has a clearly stated scale, but React Architects provide no plot area or density comparison. The west-facing position establishes the sunset outlook they describe. The supplied text does not make claims about solar gain, energy use or environmental performance. Its commitment is spatial and topographical, not technical.
The description translates what React Architects call the characteristics of the Cycladic landscape into a contemporary dwelling. That formulation links the project to place, but it leaves the means unstated. No material palette, structural system, retaining method or assembly detail appears in the record. For a house conceived through the act of shaping ground, those are not minor footnotes. They are the argument.
Who made the project?
Alongside React Architects, the credits list 10 manufacturers:
- Contain
- Develime
- FILPRO
- Kritikos Efarmoges
- LACOMAR
- PAFOS SA
- SOFA DESIGN STUDIO
- Subzero
- THERMOPANART
- halo Lighting
React Architects’ credits identify the firms attached to the project. They do not assign products, materials or systems to individual manufacturers. The distinction matters: the project’s central claim concerns construction and terrain, while the supplied description leaves the construction case largely unstated.
React Architects’ text also omits the room program, dimensions beyond the total area, cost, client and completion status. The 2025 entry identifies the project year, not necessarily a completion date. The record therefore establishes the project’s scale, authorship and stated concept, but not its technical execution.
Alonakia House nevertheless offers a coherent proposition. React Architects describe a 350 m² dwelling that treats the steep west-facing site in Antiparos as an active part of the design, with the Aegean sunset beyond it.
The next test is physical: whether drawings, construction details and site photographs can demonstrate the claimed continuity between house and ground. Until then, the topography is the strongest idea in the project. It is also the one that demands proof.
Source: ArchDaily
More from Amara Osei
Show full bio
Market editor covering companies, deals and strategy in construction industry, architecture, interior design at Built Current.
277 articles

